Your comments

In the wiki: http://wiki2.iridiummobile.net/GUI_API#IR.EVENT_ITEM_SHOW


IR.AddListener(IR.EVENT_ITEM_SHOW,IR.GetItem("Popup 1"),function()
// Event is activated when popup 1 is shown
{
IR.Log("Popup 1 is Showing");//Outputting the message in the console
IR.ShowPopup("popup2")
IR.HidePopup("popup1")
IR.HidePopup("popup3")
});



IR.AddListener(IR.EVENT_ITEM_HIDE,IR.GetItem("Popup 1"),function()
// Event is activated when popup 1 is hidden
{
IR.Log("Popup 1 is hidden");//Outputting the message in the console
IR.TogglePopup("popup2")
IR.TogglePopup("popup3")
});

1.0.4 is what I am running and pretty sure I set the projects up in.


Attached are the projects. Happening consistently with this project


CGate.rar

Please Go back to the option of NOT having project overview organised into only Pages and only Popups


in iRidium 2 we could add our own folder and put both pages and popups in the folder - very useful on large projects


EG

Folder Floor 1

Sub folder - room 1

page 1

popup 1

popup 2

....

sub folder - room 2

...

Folder Floor 2

Folder AV

Folder Security


Without this level of organisation it is VERY DIFFICULT to navigate large projects


AND

why when I migrate a project from 2 to 3, do I lose the folders that were there, many with only popups in them.




Sorry I disagree. Corel Draw, Word and Excel are not development environments.


It is normal in IDE's (Integrated Development Environments) to be able to open a project and upgrade it, it is not normal to be able to downgrade a project to a previous version. There is a lot more to saving a project in an IDE than there is changing the save format in an application like Word or Excel. I think is this is likely to be a big job that will possibly create more problems than it is worth.


I vote to keep iR2 and iR3 in separate IDE's





From the Popen link above:

"Popen does not work in the i3 pro client application" so this does not solve the problem


Also, in a normal UDP driver project, the device shows as offline if it does not exist, it is only in the server project that does not show correctly.

This is another 'feature' that is present in Visualisation projects and iRidium 2, but not iRidium 3 server projects!


Please just implement as a missing function, and plan it rather than have voting for it.

This is a missing feature, not a new feature, and should NOT need to be voted on.


In my opinion iRidium Server is unusable without merging! Without merging (an EXISTING feature) drivers need to be added from scratch rather than merged in; what a time waster.


Please change to planned and tell me when it will be released.

Further to above, in a normal UDP driver project, the device shows as offline if it does not exist, it is only in the server project that does not show correctly.


EG custom UDP driver, in this example IP address is not on the network, the same as the test in iRidium Server driver, and it correctly shows the device is not online:


Great, thanks!

Hi Oksana

True.

However, if the device the UPD is connecting to is not there, it should not be showing as online.


Suggestion

Send a ping to UDP driver IP addresses - if ping fails device is not online

EG ping will respond with an ICMP Destination Unreachable packet.